Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog : Florida Insurance Lawyer & Attorney : Merlin Law Group Law Firm : Tampa, Houston, Coral Gables, Gulfport

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued a 21-page opinion in the case of Consolidated Companies, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Company, No. 09-30178, ___ F. 3d ___ (5th Cir. August 17, 2010). The opinion is dense, to say the least, but it resolves an issue that sometimes can make or break a settlement in business interruption claims.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (2)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

*(Note: Bob Glasser is a managing director at BDO Consulting, a division of BDO and Seidman, LLP, in the New York office. Mr. Glasser is a certified public accountant, a certified fraud examiner and a certified insolvency reorganization accountant, with more than thirty years of diverse financial management and accounting experience at public and private companies. Mr. Glasser leads the firm’s New York Insurance Claim Services practice).

Most CFOs and risk managers have an understanding of their property and liability insurance needs and dollar limits and are comfortable purchasing coverage that protects their companies from a loss due to an insured peril. However, it has been my experience that their comfort level drops dramatically when it comes to business interruption coverage and limits. The uncertainty surrounding business interruption coverage, extensions of coverage and respective limits of that coverage consistently results in many middle-market organizations finding themselves underinsured and short of cash when faced with a major loss. Even the fortunate CFOs and risk managers who have not experienced a major loss may eventually discover that they have been significantly overinsured for business interruption losses and paying unnecessarily higher premiums for their coverage. Of course, the more devastating situation is finding out after a shutdown of operations from a loss that company management has not mitigated the company’s risk of lost profits and now has insufficient coverage to protect profits and cash flow during a potentially long period of restoration.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Yesterday, Rocco Calaci posted a blog entry announcing that La Niña conditions are already being observed. While I dare not attempt to explain the mechanics of these conditions, it is generally understood that La Niña is a climate phenomenon that is marked by an unusual cooling of the sea surface in the Pacific Ocean, which in turn affects wind and weather patterns globally. It is also generally said that these conditions foster more frequent and stronger storms in the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico. As a result, NOAA has forecasted 14 to 23 named storms, of which 8 to 14 are expected to be hurricanes and 3 to 7 major hurricanes during this season.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The “Period of Restoration” in a business interruption claim is a concept of time. The period, as defined in most ISO forms, begins at the time of “direct physical loss or damage” and ends on the earlier of “the date when the property should be repaired, rebuilt, or replaced with reasonable speed and similar quality.” […] or “the date when the business is resumed at a new permanent location.”

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

(Note: This Guest Blog is by Michelle Claverol, an attorney with Merlin Law Group in the Coral Gables, Florida, office. This is the part of a series she is writing on business interruption claims).

Most extra expense provisions state that coverage will be extended for necessary expenses that the insured incurs during the “period of restoration.”

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The tragedy of loss of human life and damage to the environment when discussing the BP Oil Spill cannot be overstated. The important role that accountants and business interruption experts will play helping prove financial loss cannot be overstated either. Experienced professionals like Bob Glasser, noted in yesterday’s Are Lawyers Pandering for BP Oil Spill Clients Going to Get Sued for Malpractice in Follow-up Class Actions? A Guest Blog Regarding Business Claims By Bob Glasser Explains and Guest Blogger Bruce Smith, who wrote The Forensic Accountant's Role In Business Interruption And Business Income Claims, should be in high demand from businesses and entities that lose revenue and income as a result of this oil spill. Attorneys presenting these lost income claims should consider hiring such individuals as consultants and financial expert witnesses.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

(Note: This Guest Blog is by Michelle Claverol, an attorney with Merlin Law Group in the Coral Gables, Florida, office. This is the part of a series she is writing on business interruption claims).

Complying with code upgrades often extends the period of time it takes to repair or replace the property after a loss. Depending on the type and nature of the code requirements, repairs could be extended for several months and depending on the type of policy this time delay may not be covered. Depending on the size of the business, this could translate into significant unrecoverable losses.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (3)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

(Note: This Guest Blog is by Michelle Claverol, an attorney with Merlin Law Group in the Coral Gables, Florida, office. This is the part of a series she is writing on business interruption claims). 

New York-based drugstore chain, Duane Reade, must feel like it is Ground Hog Day every time their attorneys call to give status on their case against St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. Duane Reade, recently acquired by Walgreens, owns and operates 200 drugstores in and around New York City, including 124 in Manhattan. Duane Reade has been battling its carrier for almost 8 years in a protracted insurance coverage dispute arising from the September 11, 2001, destruction of its single most profitable store, formerly located on the main concourse of the World Trade Center. After a bench trial, four Federal District Court opinions, an appraisal and two appeals, the business interruption saga finally came to an end.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

(Note: This Guest Blog is by Michelle Claverol, an attorney with Merlin Law Group in the Coral Gables, Florida, office. This is the part of a series she is writing on business interruption claims). 

“Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes” – Oscar Wilde

I picked up a couple of pointers worth sharing in an article published by the University Risk Management and Insurance Association titled, "Case Study-Business Interruption: An Exposure by Many Names," by William Austin, et al., (2005). The article examined a case study similar to what some academic institutions near the Gulf Coast experienced in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. The business interruption case study, however, was analyzed in a scenario where a catastrophic fire damaged a state of the art research facility at a higher education institution that thrived on revenue from its prestigious research and development programs.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

(Note: This Guest Blog is by Michelle Claverol, an attorney with Merlin Law Group in the Coral Gables, Florida, office. This is the part of a series she is writing on business interruption claims).  

Several weeks ago, in a blog titled To Consider the Economy, or Not to? ‘That is the Question’, I examined two diverging legal views regarding the use of post-loss market conduct in business interruption claims. In that blog, I borrowed information from an article published in the July/August 2009 issue of Coverage titled “Measuring Business Interruption Loss in Wide-Impact Catastrophes: Insurance Against Catastrophes or Only Against Insured Damage from Catastrophes?” by Richard Chattman and Gregory Miller and I explained that:

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

(Note: This Guest Blog is by Michelle Claverol, an attorney with Merlin Law Group in the Coral Gables, Florida, office. This is the part of a series she is writing on business interruption claims).  

In general, business interruption insurance is intended to return to the insured's business the amount of profit it would have earned, had there been no interruption of the business or suspension of its operations. However, business interruption coverage ought not be used to put the insured in a better position than it would have occupied without the interruption. Most policies will therefore typically exclude coverage for any consequential (or remote) losses, delay, loss of use or loss of market, which do not directly flow from a covered loss.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (3)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

(Note: This Guest Blog is by Michelle Claverol, an attorney with Merlin Law Group in the Coral Gables, Florida, office. This is the part of a series she is writing on business interruption claims).  

In this business, everyone has their own style of “working a claim.” There are, however, healthy techniques of claim presentation that practitioners should follow to effectively present a business interruption claim.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

(Note: This Guest Blog is by Michelle Claverol, an attorney with Merlin Law Group in the Coral Gables, Florida, office. This is the part of a series she is writing on business interruption claims). 

In these tough economic times, many businesses are looking to cut expenses and trim their budgets. While it is tempting to reduce insurance coverage to minimize operating costs, business owners should not skimp on insurance protection to trim budgets, particularly when it comes to additional coverages like Extra Expense Coverage.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

I represented a Houston based hotel management company last spring regarding Hurricane Ike insurance claim disputes with eleven hotels they owned or managed in Texas. Some cases simply go right, and this one settled after two months. My client’s owners went out of their way to call to my attention that managers in the hospitality and real estate management business needed to be taught about the insurance claim game. The next thing I knew, they were putting a phone to my ear and I was talking to Stephen Barth of HospitalityLawyer.com.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

(Note: This Guest Blog is by Michelle Claverol, an attorney with Merlin Law Group in the Coral Gables, Florida, office. This is the tenth and final part in a series she is writing on valued policy laws).

In general, business interruption coverage is supposed to provide the capital needed to sustain a business while its operations are suspended as a result of damage caused by a covered peril.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

A recent Louisiana decision, Isidore Newman School v. J. Everett Eaves Inc., No. 2008-1368, 2009 La. App LEXIS 1469 (La. App. 4 Cir., Aug 5, 2009), underscores the need for insurance agents and policyholders to fully discuss insurance needs when selecting types and amounts of coverage. Insurance agents generally have a duty to exercise reasonable care and competence in obtaining and communicating information to policyholders. Interestingly, this case also demonstrates that business policyholders have a similar duty as well.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

One of the more interesting aspects of my job as an advocate for policyholders is learning from non attorneys what insurance products mean at the point of sale and how they are supposed to work after the loss. This may seem a little curious to many, but if you think about it, why would anybody trust a judge’s ruling on a medical malpractice case to explain how to practice medicine? Judges are not trained in insurance. Attorneys who say they practice insurance recovery law, but learn insurance coverage and practice only by reading legal cases are too arrogant and ignorant to be in it for the policyholder. Maybe those types of attorneys can find their way to the insurer’s employ, so my job is made easier.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (1)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Coinsurance penalties are the last thing policyholders worry about following a loss. My experience has been that many field adjusters fortunately do not go through the costly calculations to accurately determine if a structure is underinsured. Thus, the penalties from being underinsured do not arise as often as they could.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (2)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

I saw a number of property managers of former Community Association clients yesterday at the Community Associations Institute National Conference in New Orleans. We recalled the trials and tribulations of catastrophes long past. We consult with a number of them regarding their insurance programs and will sometimes have a conference with their insurance brokers and agents trying to anticipate coverage which would be needed in the event of another disaster.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

(Note:  This Guest Blog is by Deborah Trotter, an attorney with Merlin Law Group in the Gulfport, Mississippi office).

The spring storms and tornadoes that ripped through Mississippi, Alabama and Louisiana recently could be a preview of a devastating hurricane season. Policyholders should take the opportunity now to review their policy coverage.

One of the many things we learned from Hurricane Katrina, is that people often do not know the various insurance benefits available to them under their homeowners and/or business policies. And sadly, many insurance company adjusters do not feel obligated to inform policyholders of all of the policy benefits available to them.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks (1)
• Share Link

(*Note:  This Guest Blog is by Ed Acle, an attorney in the Coral Gables office of Merlin Law Group).

Merlin Law Group often assists commercial policyholders with claims for business interruption insurance. Many policyholders, electing to save as much as they can on their premiums, often forego this type of coverage on their policies. Those that obtain business interruption (or “BI”) insurance often neglect to take full advantage of the full protections afforded by this coverage. This could have grave implications, as the accurate application of BI coverage on a claim can often make the difference between a business’s continued operation or the shuttering of its windows forever.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (2)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Kelly Kubiak burst into my office jubilant in her recent victory over Great American Insurance Company. She received an Order granting her Motion for Summary Judgment in a case where the central dispute involved the interpretation of the valuation clause of an insurance policy. We so often talk about the problems of causation that we fail to spend enough time talking about how many benefits insurance policies are supposed to provide. It has been our experience that many policyholders think they have obtained a fantastic settlement from their insurance company until we explain how much money was left on the table through lack of knowledge and experience.

The insurance company adjuster is ethically required to help the policyholder maximize benefits. A properly trained and motivated adjuster teaches the policyholder how the policy can be used to soften the financial blow caused by insured peril. One can imagine how much money is innocently not claimed or recovered when an adjuster does not understand the policy.

In Kelly’s case, the small business she represented had an adjuster fight with the owner over  “new” merchandise versus “used” merchandise. I wonder how many other insureds have been cheated as a result of Great American's obviously wrong interpretation of the valuation clause. Many policyholders do not realize the issue or simply fail to fight the issue by retaining an attorney. Unfortunately, this scenario is repeated far too often as many insurance company adjusters do not help the policyholder find ways to encourage payment of full policy benefits.

Have you ever heard of an insurance adjuster saying, “I think the policy can help you and pay you more if you would just….?” 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments (3)
• Trackbacks
• Share Link