California Homeowner Bill of Rights to Take Effect on January 1, 2013

Those who frequent this blog know one of our goals is to educate policyholders about their rights, in particular, by identifying the bad conduct of insurance companies that frustrate the claims process and unfair practices which deny policyholders the benefits of the policy they are due.

As we usher in 2013, a new and important piece of legislation will be taking effect in California. It is the California Homeowner Bill of Rights. Although the laws do not touch on insurance directly, they are designed to give homeowners stronger protections against predatory, aggressive bank lending practices.

Most homeowners purchase insurance to protect their investment and losing a home through foreclosure is devastating. None of us want to be placed in the position of losing a home. So, just as it is important to be informed about our rights in seeking insurance benefits when suffering property damage, it is important to know what banks and lenders can or cannot do in the foreclosure process. The following are some of the key provisions in the California Homeowner Bill of Rights (available on the California Attorney General’s website at oag.ca.gov/hbor):

  • Restriction on dual track foreclosure: Mortgage servicers are restricted from advancing the foreclosure process if the homeowner is working on securing a loan modification. When a homeowner completes an application for a loan modification, the foreclosure process is essentially paused until the complete application has been fully reviewed.
  • Guaranteed single point of contact: Homeowners are guaranteed a single point of contact as they navigate the system and try to keep their homes – a person or team at the bank who knows the facts of their case has their paperwork and can get them a decision about their application for a loan modification.
  • Verification of documents: Lenders that record and file multiple unverified documents will be subject to a civil penalty of up to $7,500 per loan in an action brought by a civil prosecutor. Lenders who are in violation are also subject to enforcement by licensing agencies, including the Department of Corporations, the Department of Real Estate and the Department of Financial Institutions. [This practice of “robo-signing” is now banned.]
  • Enforceability: Borrowers will have authority to seek redress of “material” violations of the new foreclosure process protections. Injunctive relief will be available prior to a foreclosure sale and recovery of damages will be available following a sale. [Homeowners will now have the right to sue banks for material violations of the new laws.]
  • Tenant rights: Purchasers of foreclosed homes are required to give tenants at least 90 days before starting eviction proceedings. If the tenant has a fixed-term lease entered into before transfer of title at the foreclosure sale, the owner must honor the lease unless the owner can prove exceptions intended to prevent fraudulent leases apply.
  • Tools to prosecute mortgage fraud: The statute of limitations to prosecute mortgage-related crimes is extended from one to three years, allowing the Attorney General’s office to investigate and prosecute complex mortgage fraud crimes. In addition, the Attorney General’s office can use a statewide grand jury to investigate and indict the perpetrators of financial crimes involving victims in multiple counties.

I have enjoyed contributing to this blog this past year and appreciate the insightful comments.

Happy New Year!

Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.propertyinsurancecoveragelaw.com/admin/trackback/292040
Comments (1) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
DAVID WAYNE BAKER - January 16, 2013 5:20 PM

Finally, something the California State Government has done to protect the little people - Again! This is the best thing I've seen or even heard of that makes so much sense and in addition to the leveled playing field in the court room for Employer violations with regards to rip offs of our overtime and break periods, this has made real difference for those of us struggling to keep our homes month to month, year after year.

My wife and I are both native Californians and have been seriously concerned for our state over the past two decades. The Atty General should consider a run for Governor next time around. She has my vote.

Thank you Your Honor!

I can actually breath a bit easier since this Bill Of Rights was put into effect at the onset of the new year. I can already feel a different attitude from the Mortgage company as a result. We renegotiated our loan a couple of years ago and got hammered with legal fees and penalties to the tune of over ten thousand dollars and this year, after a reinstatement they denied after they created the reinstatement process in the first place, decided it wasn't good enough after all and jhust shut us down on our payment process. They are in the wrong this time and I plan to stand firm to get what we desrve and that is fairness in the mistakes and penalties phase of mortgage reinstatement or renegotiation. If they make an error, they need to Man Up as the judge on television would say!

We paid dearly when we were in the wrong, now its their turn.

Sincerest Regards and Many Thanks Again!

David Wayne Baker and family - 29Palms, CA

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.