Posted on March 24, 2010 by Donna DeVaney

What Qualifies as "Structural Damage" in Sinkhole Losses

(Note: this Guest Blog is by Donna DeVaney, an attorney with Merlin Law Group in the Tampa, Florida, office. This is a series that she and fellow attorney Kristin Demers-Crowell are writing on sinkhole issues). 

Insurance companies have come up with a whole new excuse not to pay covered sinkhole claims. The recent trend has been to deny payment on confirmed sinkhole losses by arguing the damage is not "structural" damage as defined by Florida Statute 627.706.

F.S. 627.706 states in part:

627.706 Sinkhole insurance; catastrophic ground cover collapse; definitions.--  

.....

(c) "Sinkhole loss" means structural damage to the building, including the foundation, caused by sinkhole activity. Contents coverage shall apply only if there is structural damage to the building caused by sinkhole activity.  

The meaning of the word "structural" was recently brought before Judge Barton in Hillsborough County and he ruled against the insurance company, holding that "structural" damage means damage to the "structure," which includes purely cosmetic damages. See Judge Barton’s order below:

Click image for larger view. 

While this is not an appellate decision, it is persuasive authority and insurance companies who take this position should be challenged every time.
 
Tags: , , , ,
Trackbacks (0) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.propertyinsurancecoveragelaw.com/admin/trackback/193155
Comments (1) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
shirley heflin - March 24, 2010 5:24 PM

wow...who did this Order? Last time I checked "Hillsborough County" was in the 13th Judicial Circuit...not the 6th...

SHIRLEY HEFLIN

Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.